Posts tagged as:

Personal

Getting paste the feeling of restlessness

by Henk ter Heide on Wednesday January 2, 2008

Finding a way to continue drawing after a three weeks rest.

Talking about how my father met my mother some one asked me why he was still in school when he was 28 yrs old. I never realized that but usually people finish with university when they are about 23 or 24. So during our Christmas diner I asked him about it.
He first answered that he was lazy but then told me that he has a problem with starting. He calls it his flywheel problem.
It takes him a lot of effort to start with something. But when he eventually does it takes little effort to keep going.

I knew immediately what he meant. I’ve been struggling with this problem all of my life. Only I never named it or even understood what the problem was. To me it always felt as though I hit a brick wall when I tried to start something new.
I would plan to do something. Often times something I do like. e.g. Reading a book about some subject that interested me.
But for some reason I would find it impossible to read the book. Every time I’d pick the book up to read it I would feel restless and after reading only a few sentences I would put the book down and start pacing.
Then the next time I would want to read the book I’d feel restless even before I picked the book up. In the end even looking at the book or thinking that I might read it would cause such a feeling of restlessness that I couldn’t sit down and read it.
In the end I usually concluded that I’d some how misunderstood myself and actually didn’t like the book.

Of course this was an even bigger problem when I tried to do things I didn’t like such as homework and housekeeping. There to I always thought that the feelings of restlessness had something to do with the task at hand.

About two years ago I read a little about thinking in pictures and that explained part of the problem.
(For some reason you’ll find more information about thinking in pictures when you’re reading about dyslexia then when reading about autism. It’s strange because most psychologists agree that thinking in pictures is a symptom of autism and not of dyslexia.)
Anyway one of the things I read was that people who think in pictures shouldn’t try to tell them self’s what they should do. Instead they should picture doing it.
People are often advised to picture the end result they want to reach. But for some one who thinks in pictures that is not enough. They should picture the process it will take to reach that end result.
Not only thinking of the clean house you want to have but also playing a movie of you getting out the vacuum and vacuuming the house.

For the last two years I’ve been trying this and although it works a lot better then just telling myself that I should do some thing I’m not completely satisfied.
My biggest problem is with the way I deal with drawing.
I like to draw. I like the results I’m having with drawing.
So it should be something I do a lot, but it isn’t.
The way I deal with drawing one could think that I actually hate it. That I consider it something of a chore and would want to do it as little as possible.

Until about 3 weeks ago I tried to spend about half an hour drawing every day. But I didn’t always succeed. There were a lot of could reasons not to draw.
On days I went training I didn’t draw because I was tiered. Some days I had to do a lot of household work. And other days there were other reasons.
All in all I didn’t draw that much.
The last two weeks before my holiday I was very tiered and didn’t draw and the first week of my holiday it was very cold and I didn’t draw.

I’ve just started my first drawing in three weeks and of course it’s the drawing I was planning to do three weeks ago. Quite a difficult perspective drawing.
Even before I put the first line on the paper I felt that feeling of restlessness which makes it almost impossible to sit still and draw.
I’ve been reacting in my usual manner. Drawing a little and then distracting myself with other activities. But it isn’t helping very much.
Writing this article is meant as one of the distracting activities but even now I’m feeling restless.

There’s one difference in the experience I have this time and the experience I had as a child.
Up till two years ago I never knew that I usually don’t recognize my feelings. The last two years I’ve been learning that I usually can figure out what the feeling is supposed to be even though I don’t actually feel it.

I’m getting the idea that this feeling isn’t meant to be a bad feeling. I don’t give in to the feeling but if I would I would probably be dancing with joy.
As I’m writing this I’m wondering why I don’t give in to this feeling?
Dancing with joy isn’t a bad thing to do. Who knows I could even have some fun with this feeling.

(Ten minutes of dancing)

(Ten minutes of drawing)

This was actually a very good idea. After dancing for a few minutes the feeling of restlessness was gone and I could draw for a few minutes. Of course it did come back. But I can always dance a little more.
This is a lot more useful then pacing my room.

{ 0 comments }

Don’t feel like talking (Drawing: Lines inside hand)

by Henk ter Heide on Monday November 12, 2007

The exercises in the book Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain seem to be working.

I haven’t done much the last few days. I haven’t written any articles because I didn’t feel like talking and writing is a form of silent talking. Neither did I draw anything.
Drawings come with little stories I repeat in my head until I write them down. Since I didn’t feel like talking I couldn’t get myself to do a drawing.

The last few days I’ve just been playing some computer games. Feeling a little disappointed about the whole “Right brain” thing. It didn’t work. Nothing changed.
Only yesterday I realized that I actually couldn’t expect anything to have change since I’ve only just started with the book. I should continue.

I did and found that what I’m experiencing right now is perfectly normal. After doing the first few assignments people usually feel resistance against talking.

I am experiencing a few problems that give me the feeling that the left side of my brain won’t just give up control. But I’ll tell some more about that in a while.
For now, here the next assignment.
While looking at your left hand you have to draw the lines in your hand. You have to draw for five minutes without looking at the drawing.
The idea seems to be to bore the left side of your brain into submission.

To know when the five minutes are reached you have to set a timer.
With the first attempt I got bored and stopped. After the second attempt I felt that I might get a better result if I tried again.
I don’t think I did. Although you can’t tell by looking at the drawing since the drawing is only meant to be an tool to reach a certain feeling.
Lines inside hand
Lines inside hand

{ 0 comments }

Understanding right sided thinking (Drawing: Horse without a knight)

by Henk ter Heide on Tuesday November 6, 2007

After reading some more and thinking a lot about it, I’m beginning to understand the right sided thinking and why it seems to be much more easy for me.

It turns out that I didn’t do my last two drawing in the way the book expected. With the Faces and vases drawing you were supposed to name the parts of the face you were drawing in the left face. Then draw two horizontal lines and then draw the right face.
It’s quite possible that this drawing is almost impossible if you do it that way.
But of course I didn’t. I don’t like thinking in words. I do it much to often and get very tired. Especially when I’m drawing I try to only think in pictures.
My way of drawing a face is think of a face in silhouette and trace it. The tracing part still doesn’t work that well. But it is getting easier.
With the right face I switched to the vases view and there was nothing to it.

It isn’t completely clear to me whether people were supposed to recognize the subject of the up side down drawing. For most people trying to draw an up side down picture is so taxing that they stop talking inside their mind.
The point being that talking is an ability of the left side of the brain and drawing is an ability of the right side. Drawing up side down is so taxing that the left side gives it up and leaves it up to the right side to do the job.

The book describes a special feeling people are supposed to have while they are doing this kind of drawings. You should feel more alert, more relaxed and not notice the passing of time.
I can’t say that I experienced a special feeling while doing the up side down drawing.
I do have those feelings when I concentrate on thinking in pictures. Especially noticing the passes of time seems to be something that is closely related to thinking in words.
I remember from my youth, when I primarily thought in picture, that I had very poor sense of time. But of course back then they called it day dreaming.

Could it be that one of the differences between autistic and other people is that autistics make more or better use of the right side of their brain?
I don’t know.
I do know that autistics are supposed to have a different thought process. I can think in words but it is a lot of work. Very taxing.

Any way. The book advices to do several up side down drawings before going on with the next assignment.
This was supposed to be a horse with a knight. But when I copy I always enlarge. So by the time I got to the head there was no room left for the knight.
I drew the horse up side down and then turned the page to draw in the shades.

Considering that this is the first time in my life that I’v drawn any kind of animal. I think it’s not to bad. (Except for the right fore leg.)
Horse without a knight
Horse without a knight

{ 0 comments }

Drawing up side down

by Henk ter Heide on Friday November 2, 2007

Spoiler: If you’re planning to read and use the book Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain you’d probably better not read this article.

After doing the somewhat strange first assignment to awaken the right side of your brain I went on with the even stranger second assignment.

The author describes how she found that her students can copy very complicated paintings with great ease if she turns the painting up side down.
The theory is that people normally use symbols when they try to draw something. So you might draw eyes as two concentric circles even if the eyes in the painting are picture perfect. But when the painting is turned up side down people don’t recognize the subject and draw what the see instead of what they “should” draw.
The second assignment uses this same technique.

Only thing was that it didn’t work for me.
Turning the page I was presented with an up side down picture of what seemed to be Einstein. But the caption read that it was a Philippe Halsman. Turning the book up side down I still thought it looked like a picture of Einstein. Turning it back and re-reading the caption I found that the picture was taken by P. Halsman.
According to the text it was indeed a picture of Einstein and apparently most people have a lot of difficulty recognizing pictures that are up side down.

The assignment was to copy an up side down drawing. Picasso’s Portrait of Igor Stravinsky. The point was stressed that you should first draw the picture before turning the book around to see what it looked like. Otherwise this assignment won’t work.
But again I didn’t see the problem. Although it’s a drawing that is very difficult to copy I had no problems what so ever in recognizing what it was about: A man in jacket and tie sitting in a wooden chair.
Up side down
Up side down

Half way through the drawing I decided to give up.
Not the drawing but my neat way of drawing.
This drawing has a lot of lines that are far from straight. But if you try to copy them in exactly the way Picasso drew them they tend to get very straight. I decide to draw a little sloppy. Hoping that it would bring some life to the drawing. And it did.
Right side up
Right side up

{ 6 comments }

Left or right sided thinking (Drawing: Faces and Vases)

by Henk ter Heide on Friday November 2, 2007

To draw better you’ll have to learn to awaken the right side of your brain.

The idea behind Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain is that the two halves of the brain have different tasks and different strengths. To clarify that the book has some information about research that is done and the relation between being right or left handed and thinking with the left or right side of your brain.
But I already knew most of that so I skipped that chapter.
The book did have a very interesting table of characteristics of the left and right half of the brain. I don’t know if I can put it like this but going by this table it seems that I use the right side of my brain much more then most people.

After this little explanation the book goes on with several exercises that are meant to awaken the right side of your brain.
The first is rather strange.
I had to start out to draw the left face (if you’re right handed) of the face/vase drawing and then draw the right side.

It seemed to me that would be a very easy assignment and it was. It took me about 30 seconds. The only hard bit is after you’ve drawn the forehead, of the right face, you have to decide whether the line should go to the right or to the left.
At that point you switch the picture in your mind from faces to vases.
Although it isn’t very easy to draw the vase exactly symmetrical the overall shape isn’t that hard.

Faces and vases
Faces and vases

The confusing part started when I read on. Apparently you’re supposed to take five or six minutes to do this drawing. Why on earth would you want to take that much time?
I feel like I’m back in school and I’ve just finished some exam well before my classmates. Did I miss something?
There’s a two page explanation about why this drawing is so difficult and different solutions people chose to solve it. But there is no mention of what you should do if you didn’t have a problem.

That leave one big question. Isn’t this drawing a problem for me because the brain of autistics is wired differently. Or is this just something that is different in me.

{ 0 comments }

Being autistic or having autism

by Henk ter Heide on Saturday October 27, 2007

Thinking about the relation between autism and identity.

The last few weeks I’ve been thinking a lot about the difference between having autism and being autistic.
When I first started writing about autism I talked about having autism primarily because there are more searches for the keyword “autism” then for the keyword “autistic” and I wanted my writings to be found. Even so I had to correct myself several times. I’m prone to using the word autistic.
In the mean time I also read about autism. At first I read about the symptoms of autism and those article were written by experts in the field who always talked about having autism.
The last few months I try to read article that are written by people that have experience with autism themselves. That turns out to be much harder for the simple fact that there don’t seem to be many people with autism who blog about autism.
But the few I’ve found are adamant in their opinion that it should be “having autism” and not “being autistic”.

They seem to hold the same opinion I come across at the sheltered workplace were I work. “I’m not a wheelchair but I sit in a wheelchair.” Or a more clear cut explanation: Not being able to walk or to see or to lift heavy objects is only one of my qualities. It’s not my foremost quality.

But I still haven the feeling that it should be “I am autistic” and not “I have autism”.

So I’ve been thinking about the difference by comparing it to being gay.
I’ve defined myself as being gay, although it is indeed only one of my qualities, ever since I was 18 yr old.
I discovered that I liked men when I was sixteen. For two years I thought about what that meant for my life and what kind of problems I would have to face and by the time I was 18 I came out of the closet. I have had my fair share of problems but I must say that hardly any of them had anything to do with being gay.

But there is more.
I’ve met several thousand gay people over the years and in general they had a good life and were happy with the choices they had made.
I’ve also met some 50 to 60 men who like men and without exception they have a lot of problems. Not only with their sexuality but with all parts of their lifes.
They don’t like the job they have. They don’t like their girlfriends/wifes. They don’t like sneaking around (although they only think about it but never actually do). And most of all they are always afraid that they will be found out and loose every thing they have. (Although I would think they hardly have anything that is worth anything.)

Reading about the problems that people who have autism describe I’m reminded of a lot of the problems that are common with men who like men.
Fears of the consequence of being different. Fears of being bullied. Fears of not fitting in. Stories about painful remarks people have made.
What I miss are stories about solutions. Thinking about the sort of problems you’re likely to face and how you will deal with them. Instead of being blindsided the moment it happens.

So what’s the difference?
Well the difference between having autism and being autistic is something I’m still thinking about. But the difference between being gay and liking men is something I’ve solved years ago.

Sexual preference is hereditary. It’s something that just happens to you. You don’t control it. It’s something that makes you different from other people and they will react.
Identity is a choice you make. Usually it entails thinking a lot about your main characteristics. It means that you’ll have to think about what you want from life and what you want to change. You’ll have to think about what you could change and how to do that. You’ll also have to think about the characteristics you can’t change and how to deal with those. You’ll have to think about the kind of problems you’ll have to face and how to deal with them.

It’s a lot of work to think about identity but at some point you’ll be finished. You will have a blue print with a describtion of the way you want to live your life. Although this blue print won’t prevent you from having problems it will make it a lot easier to deal with those problems.

Twenty five years ago I had dozens of strategies about how I could deal with the kind of problems a gay man could face. I’ve forgotten most of them because I never came across any of those problems.
I’m not sure why that is. Maybe I was to pessimistic about what could go wrong. Or maybe I was able to recognize problems and avoid them. Or maybe I displayed so much selfconfidence that people left me alone.

This time I think it’s probably better to just define an identity for myself to steer my choices. I don’t think it’s a good idea to spend to much energy in thinking out strategies for situations that might never happen.

I define my identity as autistic gay artist who will get back at his ideal weight of 65 kg at some future point.

{ 0 comments }

Still hard (Study: Tree 10)

by Henk ter Heide on Wednesday October 17, 2007

Suffering from a little self pitty and talking about the goal of the study.

Shouldn’t drawing get easier with time? After nearly ten months I would have expected to have lost the fear of failure.
The last few days were much easier then usual so I thought I was finaly over it. But no.
Today I feel as anxious as always. And for what.
The drawing isn’t that hard.

Most times I have some kind of plan before I put the pencil to paper.
Today I want to know what happens if I take purple and blue as primary colors and yellow as secondary color. Purple for everything that has to do with the bark and blue for everything leaf like.
I also want to know what will happen if I change the drawing direction.
Tree 10
Tree 10

Changing the drawing direction changes the feeling I get from the drawing. Vertical line give me a feeling of strenght. The lines in this tree where not really horizontal but perpendicular on the lines in yesterdays tree.
This tree feels as thought it’s much fatter then yesterdays tree, although it’s about the same size.
Coloring yellow on top of the blue and the purple and in one stroke seeing the purple turn into brown and the blue into green was funny. A bit magical.

The problem with the (not really) horizontal lines was that the blue spills over the edge. It’s a little tricky to cover the blue with the yellow. So I get edges that are either blue or yellow but not green.
There is of course a simple sulotion to this problem and that is to draw in a background.
The question is? What will work better?
First drawing the tree and then filling in a blue background. Or coloring half the sheet blue and then sculping out the tree with yellow.
Or some combination.

{ 0 comments }

Going for broke (Drawing: No more blue)

by Henk ter Heide on Tuesday October 16, 2007

I’m reminded to do the best I can.

On Sundays I play the board game Rummycub with a group of elderly ladies.
When I started some five years ago I soon found that the safest way to play the game was to never play out all the stones I had on my board. That way I always had stones to play and would have to buy as little is possible.

For a few years that seemed a very save way of playing. Only last year I realized that it actually kept me from winning.
Playing save means that you never concentrate very well. You never look for clever moves. Very often I only saw that I could have played a stone after I had finished my turn.
In the end it meant that I almost always lost the game.

Ever since I always go for broke. I played every stone I had on my board. If I didn’t see and obvious way to play I made an effort to find clever ways to play my stones.
I still loose a lot of games but not for lack of trying.

Today I again had the feeling that I was getting to the end of my rope. I did know what the next drawing should be. But I didn’t know what I would draw their after.
To play it save I decided to make something a bit artsy. A lot of blue with branches and leafs.

Half way through I remembered that when times get hard it’s always best to go for broke. After I’ve drawn todays tree I’ll probably think of something else. But even if I don’t.
It’s better to draw nothing for a few days then to bore my self to death with a drawing I don’t even like.

Which leaves the question what to do with the half finished drawing. Should I through it out and forget that it ever happened. Or should I publish it and try to remember never to make this mistake again.
No more blue
No more blue

{ 0 comments }

Dialing down expectations

by Henk ter Heide on Monday October 1, 2007

I have to dial down my expectations to, hopefully, reach a point where I can fulfill my expectations.

Working at the sheltered workplace I meet a lot of people who feel that they are destined to do an important job.
Usual they are people who were born with an disability. They were told there whole lifes that people with a disability should have the same rights as other people. Sadly they were never told that they should fight as hard as other people.
For the largest part these people have hardly any schooling and never had the taste of a real job before they entered the sheltered workplace. Although they know almost nothing about real life and do the most stupid of jobs they still feel that an important job should be handed to them on a silver platter.

Although I’m also born with a disability I never knew that. A few years ago it was suggested that something might be wrong with me. I only last year it was found that I have autism.
Living in the real world I’ve always known that you have to fight for those things that are important to you. I never was very succesfull with my fight, but I did know.
I would never have expected that I would fall for the feeling that I should get something for nothing.

But I have.

When I started drawing, earlier this year, I felt that since I could see pictures clearly in my minds eye, it should be very easy to draw them. I should be able to create beautiful drawings without much of an effort.
With my first drawing I found that what I see in my minds eye looks nothing like the real thing. But I figured that with a little more experience I could make it work.
But my last two drawings make it very clear that I won’t be able to draw the pictures in my mind.

So I find myself at something of a fork in the road.
What to do next.
Feeling some what panicked last week I have been thinking about just giving up. Just putting my pencils in a cupboard and forgetting they ever excisted.
But I couldn’t do that. I couldn’t go back to a life of watching telly and playing computer games.
That would leave a big hole in my life.

The other possibility is to start experimenting. Stop trying to draw the pictures in my mind. Instead just draw.
People with autism are supposed to have very little imagination so I have no idea where that will lead me.

Maybe at some point I will find that I will have gained the skills to draw the pictures in my mind. But it is also possible that I’ll just draw nice, hopefully some beautiful, pictures without ever reaching that goal.

{ 2 comments }

Computer teaches life lesson

by Henk ter Heide on Tuesday September 25, 2007

A computer game teaches me to always play my “A” game even when the odds are stacked against me.

Practice, practice, practice. Every teacher and every coach will tell you that is the only way to learn skills. To practice and to learn them in the right order.

When you want to learn to tennis you’ll start with learning the forehand. When you’ve mastered that you’ll go on with the backhand and then the serve.

I don’t know what comes next because I never got that far.
When I started with the backhand I forgot the forehand. My coach thought I was faking and bullied me until I stopped with tennis.

Ten years after that I started fencing and again I wasn’t very good at it. In fact for six years I was the worst fencer of the club. But although we had a few very good fencer the majority of the members of the club just wanted to socialize.
I taught a number of beginning fencers the basics and everybody liked me for doing that.

Over the last year I’ve learned that forgetting skills after I’ve learned them is an intricate part of having autism.
This means that there always is a drawback in learning a new skill. I will forget a few skills in the process. Although they will come back I will forget them again the next time I learn a new skill.
Sometimes I have a hard time rembering what I liked about something when I only get worse while I practice and practice.

Two years ago I found a new hobby. Driving a car in simulation games. Games like Colin McCrea Rally (CMR) and Midnight Club.
In real live I don’t drive because I’ve problems observating traffic. Especially when I’m tired my field of vision become very narrow. So it’s very nice to drive in a game.

Off course I’m not very good at it. I loose most of my races. But what the hack. It’s just a computer game.

Two weeks ago I decided it was time for a change of scenery and I bought Colin McCrea Dirt.
Apart from a little problem with the controls CM Dirt is much better then CMR. It only has one problem.
In CMR you could play all the races. Even if you’ve lost you could go on with the next. In CM Dirt they changed that. With every race you win, you collect points and money. New races are only unlocked when you have enough points. So you have to win.

Playing as a rookie I found that there where enough races easy enough to win some points and unlock a few races. none of the new race where easy enough to win enough points. So there was nothing I could do then start again with some of the races I had lost. With a lot of luck and a little skill I won some.

After winning 15% of the races the program developed a problem. I lost the savegames file and had to start over.
The second round wasn’t as much fun. Again I had to drive races I had won easily, races I had won with a lot of effort and races I didn’t win the first time.

Last Sunday being bored I figured I might as well play a little Dirt.
When I started the game asked me whether I wanted to continue the Japanese race. I’d rather not but if you retire the game keeps bullying you (“Nobody likes quitters”) so I did and lost. The race in Japan is very difficult. A lot of tight turn and slippery roads make it almost impossible. I finished 20th on a field of 20.

After loosing a few more races I had to start all over again. Again the race in the UK.
This race is on gravel with a few very long straights and a few very difficult turns and I always finish last.
Since I always loose I thought that I might as well learn a new skill: Breaking with my left foot.
Using both my feet would no doubt mean that I would forget to steer and drive off the road. But I already do, so it really didn’t matter.

The big difficulty with steering in Dirt is that it is almost impossible to drive straight. The car keeps swaying. Which makes it very difficult to get around corners. Breaking makes matter worse.
The alternative, driving very slowly on the straights, makes for a very boring game and you always loose.

Almost 30 minutes after I started I was back at the Japanese race. By that time I was getting tired and my concentration was fading fast. So I decided to just go for it. I would probably end up in a ravine and loose but I would loose anyway.

The race in Japan starts out quite easy. A few long straights and slight turns.
I still was to slow. At the first quarter of the race I was already falling behind. I didn’t have time to look at the time announchment but the label was red instead of green.
In the second quarter of the race the pace picked up. More turns and sharper turns made the race a little harder. Again the time label was red.

In the third quarter I realized that the car had a natural rhythm to it’s swaying. If I only could think of a way to get the natural rhythm inline with the turns I had to make, I would be saved.
But in the middle of the race I had no time to think about it. I just had to go on.
Soon after that I felt that I lost control of the car. Left, right, left, right… The car almost hit a tree, the fence, the wall. Almost.

I don’t remember seeing the label of the third time announcement.

After a difficult left and right turn I finally see the finish. The last few hundred yard I battle with the controls. Then I fly over the finish.
I’ve won.
With 0.21 seconds to spair.

If there ever was a time that the odds where stacked against me. This was it.

  • Driving a race I have never won.
  • Being tired and with fading concentration.
  • Just having started to learn a new skill.
  • Being sure that I would forget some other skill.
  • Discovering a skill I’d have to learn while I’m in the midst of a race.

By all accounts I should have lost. But doing the best job I could I won.

{ 0 comments }